|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Nomad I
University of Caille Gallente Federation
21
|
Posted - 2011.12.07 12:37:00 -
[1] - Quote
Because of my tool for reaction chains to calculate investments into the market I have looked for Nanotransistors. An interesting development is showing the market for Nanotransistors. The buy orders are already down to level that some reaction pos owners don't get paid their fuel, but they are selling anyway instead of trying sell orders. They must be very desperate.
I have some bad assumptions only:
- Technetiums moon owners try to overtake the market.
- Because reaction profit is down at on every product or the prices are volatile, POS owners trying to outrun rivals.
I don't have better ideas to explain this phenomenon. Maybe you have a better one? |
Nomad I
University of Caille Gallente Federation
21
|
Posted - 2011.12.07 13:01:00 -
[2] - Quote
I don't believe it's the stockpiles of fuel prices that is running the competition. The main investment is for technetium and the prices are relativly stable. And I don't trust in the theory that pos owners are dump, because to run a Nanotransistor reaction is demanding more than 1 billion per week. Stockpiles are stupid too, because it's dead capital. |
Nomad I
University of Caille Gallente Federation
21
|
Posted - 2011.12.08 08:12:00 -
[3] - Quote
Comdyego wrote:I keep an updated costing for moon manufacturing on my spreadsheet. For costing purposes I buy materials at jita sell (including caldari fuelblocks) and sell at jita buy. Nanotransistor are currently at breakeven using this method. Fermionic Condensates and Ferrogel are quite profitable (+15%) when making them from 2nd level materials (see cost 2 column). https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqV1bpYXPCoTdExFSXdoVkU4NUUzYjhlQ3RiNXM3dHc
For POS owners fermionic condensates causes more costs, because you can't simply buy the products of simple reactions, because you would raise the prices through the sky. That means you have to run extra POS's just for production of simple reactions. |
Nomad I
University of Caille Gallente Federation
21
|
Posted - 2011.12.08 08:19:00 -
[4] - Quote
EvilCheez wrote:Quote:Tech price is not moving. The cartel seems to have set the price at 100k, and it stays within it. Maybe then the price of tech is artificially high - the cartel withholds tech to drive up price, but someone in the cartel has figured they can have their cake and eat it too by dumping the tech they withhold as discounted nanotransistors ( still above the natural market price)?
This is a very good explanation. So even when the prices for Nanotransistors on the break even point,when the prices are artificial high there is not much room for an investment.
|
Nomad I
University of Caille Gallente Federation
22
|
Posted - 2011.12.11 18:54:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ethilia wrote:This trend actually seems reminiscent of the ferrogel duping exploit. Gallente PoS are very unprofitable to run reactions with currently and the other PoS are also unprofitable and require significantly increased attention. This state of affairs makes no sense. Over supply of unreacted technetium should be depressing Tc prices while under supply of fullerides and nanotransistors should be spiking those prices.
No, if there is a cartel it makes to much sense. |
|
|
|